مدونة ابن عربي
اصحاب العقول المصابة بالكسل الفكري يمتنعنون عن دخول هذه المدونة لصاحبها ابن عربي
الاثنين، 2 مارس 2015
When the Sky's Doom closes
الأربعاء، 13 نوفمبر 2013
The origin of Theosophy and the beginning of the New Age Religion
The founder and guiding light of theosophy was a woman named Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831-1891). She spent more than twenty years traveling the world, meeting with experts in the occult. She was initiated into secret societies all over the globe. She studied in Egypt, Mexico, Tibet, Canada, and the United States, where she met Colonel Henry Olcott (1832-1907). He was a scientist and a lawyer who had been investigating the new phenomenon of Spiritualism for years. The two of them formed the Theosophical Society in 1875, convinced that science and the occult supernatural could expand both mind and spiritual power. In 1878 Blavatsky published Isis Revealed, in which she looked to the wisdom of the ancient masters for guidance in the modern world.
It soon became obvious to them that real wisdom could only be found in the East. So they traveled to India, where they established their headquarters in Madras, thus they linked their understanding of Theosophy with both Buddhism and Hinduism. They took such a proactive position for Indian independence from Britain and so become friends with the local Hindu intellectual community, and then Theosophy began to flourish.
Mrs Blavatsky published her most important work, The Secret Doctrines, in 1888 . It shows a lot of Hindu spiritual influence with its imagery of the One universal principle, which flows through all things, fighting through creation and then returning to the One. All reality is one universal consciousness. Humans, existing at different spiritual levels, are linked to the One.
Later Theosophical leaders developed a whole master hierarchy. Solar Logos rules the
الاثنين، 4 نوفمبر 2013
La sagesse sublime cachée dans l'histoire du prophète Moïse selon Ibn Arabi, 1ère partie
Selon sa signification spirituelle, le meurtre des enfants mâles ( des Israélites, meurtre ordonné par Pharaon ) dans le but de détruire le prophète ( dont la naissance lui avait été prédite) eut lieu pour que la vie de chaque enfant tué dans cette intention affluât à Moise, car ce fut en supposant qu'il était Moïse que chacun de ces enfants fut tué; or, il n'y a pas d'igorance dans l'ordre cosmique , de sorte que la vie c'est à dire l'esprit vital de chacune de ces victimes dut nécessairement revenir à Moïse. C'était de la vie pure , primordiale, n'ayant pas été souillée par des désirs égoïstes. Moïse était donc de part sa constitution psychique la somme des vies de ceux qui avaient été tués dans l'intention de le détruire. Dés lors, tout ce qui était préfiguré dans la prédisposition psychique de chaque enfant tué se retrouvait en Moïse, ce qui représente une faveur divine exceptionnelle que personne avant lui n'avait reçues.
Moïse est donc né comme une synthèse de beaucoup d'esprit vitaux, qui étaient au tant de forces actives.
Pour ce qui est de la sagesse impliquée dans le fait que Moïse a été mis dans une arche et abandonné au Nil, Ibn Arabi explique que l'arche correspond à son réceptacle humain ( Anasut) et le Nil à la connaisance qu'il dut assimiler par l'entremise de ce corps; c'est à dire par le moyen de la pensée et des facultés de sensation et d'imagination, facultés qui ne sauraint transmettre quelque chose à l'âme humaine sans
الأحد، 3 نوفمبر 2013
المكان الذي اود ان اهرب اليه
هرج و مرج في كل مكان, قتل و تشريد و اعتقال و ذبح و شريد أسر و عائلات, حروب هنا و ثورات هناك, أنه الجنون , انه الغضب المستعر الذي لا يمكن اطفائه
حقد و غلّ مرعب طاقات سلبية في كل مكان, كل حزب مستعد للفتك بالحزب المضاد له بدون اي رحمة !
بيوت مفتتة و مشتتة ما بين مؤيد و معارض
تلوث في الجو مرعب و زحام خانق , و حزن مستمر , لا سعادة في الافق قد نقنع أنفسنا اننا ان صبرنا قد ننشدها
الوضع اصبح سيء للغاية !
طبقات الناس متصارعة بشكل غير مرئي , تنتظر الطبقة الدنيا الفتك بالطبقة الاعلى منها بدون رحمة لكن بقية خوف من قانون و شبه نظام و دولة متعثرة تمنعهم من ذلك
الحقد و الحسد يملأ النفوس
و تطاحن الطبقات يثير الاشمئزاز و لا يشعرك بحالة ارتياح
" Know yourself "the origin, the meaning and the purpose, explained by René Guénon 3/3
Without this understanding , no teaching can lead to an efficient result , and teaching that does not awaken in those who received it a personal resonance can not provide any kind of knowledge. This is why Plato said that " everything that man learns is already in him." All experiences , all the external things around are indeed an opportunity to help him realize what is in himself . this awakening is what Plato calls amnesics , which means " remembrance ". If this is true for all knowledge, this is even more for a higher and deep knowledge, and when the man advance to this knowledge, all exterior and sensitive resources become increasingly inadequate, until ' they finally lose all utility . If they can help to get close to the wisdom to some degree , they are powerless to actually acquire it and it is commonly said in India that the real guru or master is in man himself and not in the outside world , although an exterior help may be useful in the beginning to prepare man to find in himself and by himself what he can not find elsewhere, and particularly what is above the level of rational knowledge . In order to achieve this knowledge ,it s necessary to realize some states which get more deep towards the center , which is symbolized by the heart , where the consciousness of man must be transferred to make him able to reach the real knowledge.
These statements which were realized in the ancient mysteries were degrees in the
السبت، 2 نوفمبر 2013
" Know yourself "the origin, the meaning and the purpose, explained by René Guénon 2/3
So there is a preparation for the wisdom which is higher than philosophy , which doesnot concern the reason, but the soul and spirit , and we can call it inner preparation , and it seems it had been the highest levels of the school of Pythagoras . It has extended its influence through the school of Plato to the neo -Platonism of the Alexandrian school , where it appears clearly again . If for this inner preparation words are still used , these could no longer be taken only as symbols for fixing the inner contemplation.By this preparation , man is led to some states that allow him to exceed the rational knowledge that he previously achieved , and as all this is above the level of reason , its was also above philosophy since the name of philosophy is always used in fact to describe something that belongs only to the reason . However, it is surprising that modern consider philosophy as if it were complete in itself , and so they forget what is higher . .
The first philosophers, especially Pythagoras , had consider their education , as being a new expression of the old ideas . There were several kinds of mysteries with diverse origins. Those that inspired Pythagoras and Plato were related to the cult of Apollo . "Mysteries" always had a reserved and secret character , the word "mystery" itself means etymologically the total silence , since things which are related to could not be expressed by words , but only taught by a silent way . But modern who ignore any other method which doesnt involve the use of words, falsely believed , that there was no teaching . We can say that this silent teaching was using figures , symbols, and other means designed to bring man to the inner states allowing him to gradually achieve the real knowledge or wisdom . This was the essential and ultimate goal of all the "mysteries" .
As for the "mysteries" that were specifically related to the cult of Apollo and Apollo himself , it must be remembered that he was the God of sun and light ,in the spiritual sense it s the source from where all knowledge , arts and sciences derive.
موضة العلمانية
هناك موضة الحاد و علمانية جارفة تجتاح الناس, شيء مرعب , الاعلام و ليس الاخوان هو من شوّه صورة المتدين, يجب عليك ان تخفي اسلامك, فالمساجد و الزوايا قفلّت ,و ان كان الله سبحانه و تعالى قد شرع لنا من الدين ان الأرض كل الأرض هي مسجد طهورا, يأتي من يشرّع لنا ان المساجد هي من زاد مساحتها عن ثمانين متر مربع و من قلّ عن ذلك فهو ليس مصلّى و لا تصلي فيه!
أهكذا هداكم شيطانكم الرجيم الى شر السبيل, أهكذا تحاربون جماعة الأخوان التى نرفض أفكارها, ان معاداة الأخوان يا سادة لا تعني بالضرورة ان نعادي الاسلام و حتى ان لم يصرّحوا بذلك, نعم ان الاخوان لا يمثلون الاسلام و لا يمثلون أهل السنة و لكن مهاجمة كل ما يمت للأسلام بصلة شيء فعلا مخيف,ان المزاج العام في مصر الان هو محاداة الدين شئت أم أبيت , فهذا شيء يقرّره من كان له ذرة عقل و منطق, فطبيعة الناس اصبحت أكثر ماديّة بشكل مرعب و هذا بكل بساطة اصبح واقع و ملاحظ من نوع الفنون الهابط و الأغاني الماجنة و الأفلام الساقطة التى تعرض على مرأى و مسمع الشعب المصري التى و يالا العجب تلاقي اقبالا عظيما و مشهودا منهم.
هذه هي النهاية يا سادة لقد انحطت اخلاق و اولويات الشعب المصري بشكل مرعب فهم اصبحوا أهل دنيا, و يبحثون عن اللذة الوقتية و المصلحة الآنية.
الجمعة، 1 نوفمبر 2013
" Know yourself " the origin, the meaning and the purpose, explained by René Guénon 1/3
"Know yourself , " we usually repeat this sentence, but we often lose sight of the true meaning . Concerning the confusion existing about this sentence two questions should be raised : the first concerns the origin of this expression , the second its real meaning and purpose. Some readers may believe that these two issues are completely separate and have no relation between them .
After reflexion , and after careful consideration; it is clear that they are closely related .
If you ask those who have studied Greek philosophy , who is the man who first had pronounced this wise sentence , most of them will not hesitate to tell that the author of this maxim is Socrates, yet some argue that it can belong to Plato and others to Pythagoras. After these conflicting opinions, we have the right to conclude that this sentence was written by none of these philosophers , and it is not with them that we must seek it s origin, simply because two of these philosophers , Pythagoras and Socrates didn't leave anything written . As for Plato , whatever its philosophical jurisdiction is , we are not able to distinguish what was said by him or by his teacher Socrates.
Much of the doctrine of the latter is only known by us through Plato, and we know , moreover, that it is in the teaching of